Distinguished Assistance by the MEPM 543- Risk Management for Project Managers Assignment Help at Expertsmind.com!

Home   Course  
Previous << || >> Next

MEPM 543- Risk Management for Project Managers Assignment Help

Replacing of a discharge header for the old pump group

COMMUNICATE HIGHLY APPRECIATED AND DEMANDED TUTORS AT OUR MEPM 543- RISK MANAGEMENT FOR PROJECT MANAGERS ASSIGNMENT HELP SERVICE!

Identified risk:

It is important to identify the particular areas, in which maximum risk are probable to occur while designing to replace discharge header from old pump groups. Following are the identified risk, for which root cause analysis and corresponding mitigation strategies are required. 

Risk 1: While considering the fluid energy, in general a centrifugal pump generates two different discharge pressure with respect to different density fluids. However the corresponding head of these two conditions will be safe. The designing of the head needs to align with the requirements like gauge, height, and velocity head, otherwise, the efficiency will be reduced (Fecarotta, 2016). 

Risk 2: For different connecting pumps, the pipe needs to be of same size, such that common head can fit to the power pressure and flow; which otherwise can damage the system. 

Risk3: For practical application, the on-site pilot scale testing is necessary which include functioning of discharge head and with compressors, motors, impellers, and turbine. This calibration is important along with the performing software, for determining the best corrective actions (O’Connor & Mosleh, 2016). Also, this procedure requires skillful personnel. 

Risk 4: The functioning of discharge head is essential to be tested with respect to (i) minimum flow requirement; (ii) backpressure and deadhead; and (iii) relief valve. Failing these test can lead to reduced efficiency as well as system breakdown (Fecarotta, 2016). 

The mentioned risk are associated with the engineering parameter of discharge heads in pump groups. However, the risk are not limited to these issues, and also include technical expertise, strength of power heads as well as testing protocols. 

Risk 5: In order to avoid accident and damage to personnel, it is important to assure that all employees have adequate skills and training. This also include policy measures to ensure safe handling and adequate protection to control health and safety of workers are available. 

Risk 6: Safety arrangement in emergency condition is another consideration in risk management. All the employees must be aware of emergency and evacuation procedure, including discovering fire alarm, fire fighter equipment, fire extinguisher as well as storage of hazardous substance. Likewise, manual handling operations which include pushing, pulling, holding, and lowering activities must be performed with appropriate measures (Li, Chen, Chang & Xu, 2019). 

Input:

- In the following considerations, it is essential to develop robust protocol for system design and sting. 

- Trained personnel must be present for practical testing. 

- Quality of the materials used in the manufacturing of motor, turbine, pipes, and heads should be checked. This requires assurance from manufacturing site (Hall, 2017). 

- Schedule management must include testing after the designing procedure. 

- On-site testing is another essential that must be managed. 

- The testing and scheduling procedure should be properly documented. 

Tools and techniques (for analysis and mitigation strategy framework) (Hall, 2017):

- Only the licensed manufacturer should be involved.

- Pumping statistics and testing data documentation.

- Clear diagram and documentation of design

- Skillful and experienced personnel to be involved at on-site testing.

- Personnel to be involved in projects: project manager, engineer, working personnel, subject matter expert, and stakeholder. 

- Checklist analysis, which must be checked by concerned authority. 

- SWOT analysis, which must include focusing on strength and concerning the weakness as risk. The strategies for competitive advantage must be included with reference to improvement of quality. 

- Cost analysis for designing and testing – must be compared with market qualities as well as cost of manufacturing and processing. 

- Collective opinion analysis from experts and experienced workforce. 

Output:

- All the testing procedures must be documented. 

- License terms must be mentioned in all documents along with date. 

- Authorized personnel must sign the documentation after verification. 

Records should be preserved for later analytical purpose.

TAKE CARE OF YOUR FINANCIAL BUDGETS BY AVAILING THE ONLINE MEPM 543- RISK MANAGEMENT FOR PROJECT MANAGERS ASSIGNMENT HELP SERVICE BY EXPERTSMIND.COM!

Tag This :- EM19COL0221WR MEPM 543- Risk Management for Project Managers Assignment Help

get assignment Quote

Assignment Samples

    Defense Mechanism Assignment Help

    This document is prepared in the MS word is about the case related to the personality and the biological distinguishing features in which views related to the

Get Academic Excellence with Best Skilled Tutor! Order Assignment Now! Submit Assignment