Portfolio Assignment - For your portfolio project, you have been asked to prepare a portfolio of materials for your boss relating to a controversial topic in your current field of study, the topic of which you chose in the Topic Discussion.
ARE YOU LOOKING FOR RELIABLE AWARENESS OF EUTHANASIA ASSIGNMENT HELP SERVICES? EXPERTSMINDS.COM IS RIGHT CHOICE AS YOUR STUDY PARTNER!
Topic - Awareness of Euthanasia
To: Abdul Dieng
From: Kangou Diarrassouba
Subject: Euthanasia
Dear Dr. Abdul Dieng
I'm writing this Email regarding the awareness program about the controversial topic of euthanasia in the United State. That will be organized under my direction in the chemotherapy IV Technician department if you please. Euthanasia is both historical and modern issues of medicine, law, morals, and religion, which is reflected in the assembly of entwined ideas and diverse legal arrangements of that question all over the world. To whether or not is a mercy killing humanely? Some believe that every patient has a right to choose when to die, while some think is inhuman.
As far as I am a concern, authorizing euthanasia would help ease the suffering of the terminally ill patient. It would be cruel and out of line to let them endure the unbearable pain. Additionally, we have to realize that the thought process of euthanasia is to "help in-passing on" easily and thus should be considered and acknowledged by law. The right to die should be a matter of personal decision, we can pick a wide range of things in life from who we wed, to what sort of work we do, and I figure when one comes to the end of his or her life, you ought to have a decision about how your life end. Individuals should be permitted to die with pride, an individual that is bed sick at the mercy of medicinal staff, and family. This can be extremely mortifying for an individual, and many would prefer not to be a weight or recalled by their family in such a way. Permitting one the chance to pick when and how they die lets them take control of their very own life. People that are living with a terminal sickness, or that are in a permanent coma, are suffering. The torment can be obliterated, and the main choice for these individuals is to take numerous medications and painkillers to help with the torment even a bit. The quality of life is exceptionally low. Euthanasia gives these individuals an approach to stop theirs and their family's misery.
We are working on the final proposal to be ready in the middle of this month, and if you have any other questions, please do not hesitate to get in touch with me.
Sincerely
Kangou Diarrassouba
Certify pharmacy Technician
2310 crescent park,
Houston Tx 77880
SAVE YOUR HIGHER GRADE WITH ACQUIRING AWARENESS OF EUTHANASIA ASSIGNMENT HELP & QUALITY HOMEWORK WRITING SERVICES OF EXPERTSMINDS.COM!
Woman research organization
7600 Fannin St,
Houston, TX 77054
To: Dr.Abdul Dieng, Director at Woman Hospital Pharmacy Department
From: Kangou Diarrassoub, Certify pharmacy Technician
Date: April 10, 2019
Subject: Euthanasia not to be muddled with medical aid-in-dying"
The peer-reviewed article selected here provides literature includes many well-informed thoughts on the topics of euthanasia which may also be called as physician-assisted suicide. This article is credible as it is government approved ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. It discusses about the rights for dignified death, euthanasia as a medical act. A doctor's support in suicide can be looked upon as helping the patient as in helping the patient to meet his personal goal and putting an end to his suffering. This can also be harmful on professional front of destroying the moral values (Boudreau, 2019).
The website which I have selected is https://euthanasia.procon.org/. This website can provide a lot of valid points for Euthanasia. It shows the positive as well as the negative aspects of legalizing the Euthanasia. Physician-assisted suicide believes that critically ill individuals should have the right to put an end their misery with a rapid, decorous, and considerate death. On the other hand the opponents put their point not to legalize the same as the doctors are obliged to follow their oath to save their patents. ("Euthanasia - ProCon.org", 2019).
The popular source which might not be acceptable while providing a formal report is https://www.churchmilitant.com. This website talks about nurses' role in aid in dying. Although it has some valid points which can be talked upon, but this source cannot be taken in a formal report. The website talks about how Euthanasia can be similar to murdering. Compelling the nurse to expedite AID makes the nurse complicit in such relinquishment. In order to make Euthanasia void this website can be of help as it talks about how mercy killing disrupts public trust and can also said to be unreliable with the essential obligations of the profession of nursing (Mahoney, 2019).
DO YOU WANT TO EXCEL IN AWARENESS OF EUTHANASIA ASSIGNMENT? HIRE TRUSTED TUTORS FROM EXPERTSMINDS AND ACHIEVE SUCCESS!
Kangou Diarrassouba
Pima Medical Institute
April 15, 2019
Mercy killing, sometimes referred to as euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide, is the practice where human life is ended intentionally to relieve the individual from their pain and suffering (van der Heide, 2013). It is usually carried out by administering a large dose of painkilling or other suitable drugs. It is, however, different from palliative sedation, as in that case the patient is made to be unconscious with the help of painkillers, and death eventually takes over naturally. Physician-assisted suicide is the act of painlessly inducing a quick death, thereby terminating the possibility of misery and pain for the patients (Del RÍo&MarvÁn, 2011). There have been numerous controversies surrounding this matter, which has made it a pressing issue for many countries and cultures (Goligher, et al., 2017). It is among the oldest points of interest when it comes to medical ethics (Boudreau & Somerville, 2014). Euthanasia should be a right that every sound-minded individual must have access to, as it helps alleviate the suffering of those that are terminally ill, enabling them to die with dignity instead of being in pain (Hemati, et al., 2016).
There are two broad categorizations of euthanasia - active and passive. Active euthanasia is where a lethal dosage of the chosen drug is administered to the patient who opts to go for the procedure after their consent has been explicitly extracted (van der Heide, 2013). Passive euthanasia is when there is no active or medical intervention to assist in the death, but the patient is usually taken off from life-support measures, eventually resulting in the termination of their life.
Euthanasia is the solution that can help end the long-term suffering of the patients who are terminally ill with no hope of recovery. This is because as the suffering progresses, the individual tends to lose autonomy over their body, which restricts them from leading a normal life (Kouwenhoven, et al., 2013). An individual is normally born with the right to choose his or her own course in life, and therefore, the choice to end their own suffering should also be available to them. Moreover, due to the illness, they become unable to engage in activities that they previously used to enjoy, which further adds to the lack of control they have other their lives and bodies. Nobody wants to die early, but it is definitely better to have laws that allow them to opt for a physician-assisted suicide when they have a medical condition from which they cannot recover. Keeping such patients alive against their own will is almost inhuman, since it is them who have to suffer from the illness.
Mercy killing also gives the freedom of choice to the people who are terminally ill. It gives them the authority to choose what they want with their life, thereby helping them to not be helpless or be at the mercy of another individual. A physician is dedicated to ensuring that their patients regain their good health and live a long life, but if death is imminent for them, then the sick must have the right to end their own unbearable suffering (Smets, Cohen, Bilsen, Van Wesemael, Rurup, &Deliens, 2011). It has been often seen that euthanasia brings peace to their families as well, since the financial and emotional turmoil of having to deal with someone who will eventually die of illness. Keeping an ill family member at a healthcare institution for such long periods of time can be very expensive. In fact, even if the patient can be allowed to stay at their home, the expenses towards the medicines, caregivers and so on, often amount to a hefty sum. For instance, if an 80-year old person is suffering from cancer, it is medically not feasible to allow the patient to undergo chemotherapy or any other procedure, and the time they have to spend alive as the cancer slowly takes its toll on them is extremely painful (Karlsson, Milberg, & Strang, 2012). Death is unpredictable, and thus it is almost a form of torment on part of the family members as they have to be prepared to let go of their loved one at any time. Euthanasia eliminates these issues, as the patient in this case reserves the right to make all the decisions. It gives the flexibility to choose the manner, time and place where the act would be carried out.
EXPERTSMINDS.COM ACCEPTS INSTANT AND SHORT DEADLINES ORDER FOR AWARENESS OF EUTHANASIA ASSIGNMENT - ORDER TODAY FOR EXCELLENCE!
It is almost impossible to find someone who does not want to die with dignity. Illness can not only be painful but also take a toll on their physical appearance. The unbearable suffering that patients have to go through robs them of this very dignity, and prolongs their unnecessary suffering, which is essentially pointless. Dying with dignity gives them the right to have a control of their own life (Hemati, et al., 2016). Every individual reserves the explicit right to die, and death is a rather private matter, and the physician-assisted suicide of a terminally sick individual does not bring harm to anyone. Furthermore, it avoids them being a burden on their family as well, since it eliminates the emotional and financial stress the members have to go through because of a sick relative. Another way of looking at it would be that euthanasia frees up the access to those healthcare facilities and resources which are scarce, as they can then be allocated to people who have a chance of living and therefore truly need it.
Thus, mercy killing is something that should be talked about more openly, because it is a procedure that has many benefits to offer. The entire process is carried out in such a way that the person does not feel any pain, thereby alleviating the suffering of the sick individuals with grace and dignity. There must of course be strict regulations pertaining to it, as it will ensure that there is no misuse regarding the laws. However, the limitations that come with it are easily outweighed by the number of advantages that mercy killing has for the patients, their family members, and the society. Moreover, it gives a significant amount of freedom to the people who make the choice to be euthanized, as they have the flexibility to choose the method as well as the time at which the procedure is to be done.
NEVER LOSE YOUR CHANCE TO EXCEL IN AWARENESS OF EUTHANASIA ASSIGNMENT - HIRE BEST QUALITY TUTOR FOR ASSIGNMENT HELP!
To: Dr Abdu Dieng, Director at Woman Hospital Pharmacy Department
From: Kangou Diarrassouba, Certify pharmacy Technician
Date: April 15, 2019
Subject: Proposal for Awareness of Euthanasia
Problem
Opponents of euthanasia and doctor-assisted suicide state that physician have a commitment to keep their patients alive as reflected by the Hippocratic Oath. They contend there might be a "slippery slope" from mercy killing to murder (which is inhuman) and that authorizing euthanasia will also unjustifiably target poor people and generate a reason for insurance agencies to end lives so they can save extra cash.
Background
Euthanasia is the solution that can help end the long-term suffering of the patients who are terminally ill with no hope of recovery. This is because as the suffering progresses, the individual tends to lose autonomy from their body, which restricts them from leading a normal life. An individual is normally born with the right to choose his or her own course in life, and therefore, the choice to end their own suffering should also be available to them. According to the Death with Dignity National Center survey methods
- 73% support euthanasia, highest level since 2005
- Liberals most supportive; weekly churchgoers least supportive
- A new high of 57% say doctor-assisted suicide is morally acceptable
Wood, J., & Mccarthy, J. (2017, June 12). Majority of Americans Remain Supportive of Euthanasia.
Solution
The best way to avoid such pain distance appears to me is to change the law, allowing critically ill patients to legally receive support to die. A good as opposed to harm, and complementary instead of in hostility toward palliative care. Therefore, what I presently recommend is to remove doctors from the decision making, which should become the job of the court of defense or councils explicitly set up for this case. This would be steady with the present job of the courts, which settle on whether patients who have been in a terminal state for a long period of time should be allowed to die and furthermore consistent with the job of the court of protection in deciding mental ability in connection to advance instructions.
Benefits
Mercy killing gives the freedom of choice to the people who are terminally ill. It gives them the authority to choose what they want with their life, thereby helping them to not be helpless or be at the mercy of another individual. Legalizing euthanasia would help ease suffering of terminally ill patients.
Conclusion
Mercy killing is something that should be talked about more openly, because it is a procedure that has many benefits to offer. The entire process is carried out in such a way that the person does not feel any pain, thereby alleviating the suffering of the sick individuals with grace and dignity. There must of course be strict regulations pertaining to it, as it will ensure that there is no misuse regarding the laws. However, the limitations that come with it are easily outweighed by the number of advantages that mercy killing has for the patients, their family members, and the society. Moreover, it gives a significant amount of freedom to the people who make the choice to be euthanized, as they have the flexibility to choose the method as well as the time at which the procedure is to be done.
ORDER NEW AWARENESS OF EUTHANASIA ASSIGNMENT & GET 100% ORIGINAL SOLUTION AND QUALITY WRITTEN CONTENTS IN WELL FORMATS AND PROPER REFERENCING.